Cruelty isn’t humorous

Published 12:00 am Sunday, February 7, 2010

I hope that Robert Hitt Neill’s column on Jan. 24 (Tough chore to tangle with a flaming polecat) was just a sick joke, but I fear it was just sick. What’s informative or entertaining about needlessly spraying an animal with lighter fluid with the intention of setting it on fire?

Even if the skunk had to be killed (which it did not), setting a live animal on fire is probably the most painful and barbaric way to do it. No true sportsman or any human being with the slightest respect for God’s creatures, would ever approve.

What if I wrote a column describing how I purposely swerved my car to hit a raccoon, but only injured it? Then I joked that if you saw a raccoon dragging itself along the road, “Well, now you know.” How would that be any different?

Email newsletter signup

Sign up for The Vicksburg Post's free newsletters

Check which newsletters you would like to receive
  • Vicksburg News: Sent daily at 5 am
  • Vicksburg Sports: Sent daily at 10 am
  • Vicksburg Living: Sent on 15th of each month

As an ex-newspaper reporter, I defend the right of newspapers to print almost anything, including folksy columns about country life. However, this column was merely an exhibition of cruelty and had no place in any newspaper.

Richard Smith

Vicksburg